The headings listed below must be used to delineate the sections of content. These sections include the following: a clear introduction that provides a general review and organizes the research in a meaningful way; a discussion in which the evidence is presented through analysis, critique, and synthesis; and a conclusion in which the discussion is drawn together in a meaningful way, the claims of the introduction are brought to a logical closure, and new research is proposed(1)Introduction:Provide a conceptual framework for the review.Describe how the review will be organized. The questions below may be used to guide this section.What are the guiding theories within the domains?How are the domains connected?Are there competing points of view across the domains?Why is the integration of these domains important?What is the history of these domains?What are the related theories or findings?Describe how the literature was identified, analyzed, and synthesized.How and why was the literature chosen?What is your claim or thesis statement?(2)Discussion:Provide the analysis, critique, and synthesis for the review?(3)Analysis:Examine the main ideas and relationships presented in the literature across the four domains?Integrate concepts from the four different content domains within the larger field of psychology?What claim(s) can be made in the introduction?What evidence supports the claim(s) made in the introduction?(4)Critique:Evaluate the reliability, validity, and generalizability of the chosen research findings.How well does the literature represent the issues across the four domains?Identify the strengths and the key contributions of the literature.What, if any, deficiencies exist within the literature?Have the authors omitted any key points and/or arguments?What, if any, inaccuracies have been identified in the literature?What evidence runs contrary to the claims proposed in the introduction, and how might these be reconciled with the claims presented?Explain how the APA’s Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct might influence the reliability and/or generalizability of the chosen findings.Did the ethical issues influence the outcomes of the research?Were ethical considerations different across the domains?(5)Synthesis:Integrate existing ideas with new ideas to create new knowledge and new perspectives?Describe the research that has previously been done across these domains, as well as any controversies or alternate opinions that currently exist?Relate the evidence presented to the major conclusions being made?Construct clear and concise arguments using evidence-based psychological concepts and theories to posit new relationships and perspectives on the topics within the domains?(6)Conclusion:Provide a conclusion and present potential future considerations?State your final conclusion(s)?Synthesize the findings described in the discussion into a succinct summary?What questions remain?What are the possible implications of your argument for existing theories and for everyday life?Are there novel theories and/or testable hypothesizes for future research?What do the overarching implications of the studies show?Where should the research go from this point to further the understanding of these domains and the greater study of psychology?

Two Separate AssignmentsPART 1-Discussion 250 words: Describe the difference between fear and anxiety (Also give examples)PART 2- Three pages : Explore and explain the various influential factors of Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (ie., biological and environmental research)———————————–>See Video and see attachment <--------------------------------------------> Video with direction. Please watch before attempting to complete Part 2 Assignment <---------https://youtu.be/MDqu_k0LKkQDue Saturday March 26, 2022***PLEASE DON'T ACCEPT IF YOU CAN'T DELIVER***

Participant ReactivityThink about how participants might react to environmental cues in an experimental situation and create a hypothetical study on assertiveness. It is important for you to remember that the study should not be designed to test participant reactivity. Summarize the study in a few sentences, and explain how some specific items in the laboratory environment in your made-up study might cause participants to respond in a particular way. What could be done in your study to reduce participant reactivity?

InstructionsYou are being tasked with writing 2 sample exam questions for each of the 5 Course Outcomes for this class, and to briefly explain how/why you think the question you constructed aligns with the objective. Your questions must address a topic covered in the chapter readings or lessons up-to-date.  To receive full credit, your multiple-choice question must meet the following criteria:Your question must be written clearly. And it must specifically state what you want in an answer.Questions must be accompanied by an explanation of  how/why you think the question you constructed measures the objective.Answer options must be mutually exclusive. This means that you can’t have any questions that have more than one best (or true) answer.Questions must be no more than 2 complete sentences.Each question requires an option of A, B, C and D. This means that someone answering your questions must be able to choose from 4 options.Below you will find the Course Outcomes for the class.1. Apply principles of developmental theories to explain physical, cognitive, and socioemotional development throughout the lifespan.2. Compare normal physical, cognitive, and socioemotional development with abnormal development throughout the lifespan.3. Explain the progression of development across the human lifespan and assess options to improve the quality of life throughout the lifespan.4. Identify and analyze factors influencing human development.5. Evaluate research in lifespan development and link evaluation to personal research and clinical practice.

I need to answer two of my peers comments